Wilderness Politics in Finnish Lapland: Core and Periphery Conflicts
Approving public policy for managing nature tourism or visitor use in national wilderness areas in Finnish Lapland is a source of political conflict. People living in northern Finnish communities have an ideology of nature and economic interests setting them apart as a rural culture distinct from southern urban populations. Using dependency theory, this paper argues that the Helsinki government should invest northern people with the rights of a minority culture, which would help to equalize power relations between the core and periphery regions of the country. Suggested policies include protecting customary hunting rights and developing nature tourism in ways that support local economies. Attention is also given to the need to preserve the wild character of designated wilderness areas.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
a. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication, with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
b. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
c. The journal has the right to authorize third-party publishers & aggregators to include the Article in databases or other services (EBSCO, Proquest).
d. The journal has the right to share the Article on the Internet, through social media and other means.