Fixing Land Use Planning in the Yukon Before It Really Breaks: A Case Study of the Peel Watershed
AbstractFor eight years, the Yukon Government and four First Nation governments—the First Nation of Na-cho Nyak Dun, the Gwich’in Tribal Council, the Vuntut Gwitchin First Nation, and the Tr’ondëk Hwëch’in First Nation—have been working to create a land use plan for the Peel Watershed in northeast Yukon, Canada. This paper analyzes publicly available data on the decision-making process led by the Yukon Government following submission of a final recommended land use plan by the Peel Watershed Planning Commission. We argue that the Yukon Government failed to effectively reconcile different perspectives and values through the decision-making process. Using an analytical framework from the policy sciences, we contend that it is not the polarizing nature of these perspectives that has caused land use planning for the Peel region to break down; rather it is a broken decision-making process that to date has failed to secure the common interest. This failure has left many of those involved in the Peel region’s land use plan with the perception that their voices are no longer being heard in this process. We describe how these fractures occurred and present a number of recommendations that could improve the decision-making process for the Peel Watershed land use plan, with application for future such processes elsewhere in the Yukon.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
a. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication, with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
b. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
c. The journal has the right to authorize third-party publishers & aggregators to include the Article in databases or other services (EBSCO, Proquest).
d. The journal has the right to share the Article on the Internet, through social media and other means.