Rurality and Northern Reality
AbstractFrom the examination of the concepts of both “rurality” and the “North,” the geographical and “technical” meanings of these concepts are socially and politically based. The quantitative, technical definitions tend to focus either on a simple variable related to distance from urban areas, or size of population, regardless of what lies between. There is also a dominant, socially created association between the rural and an agricultural or suburban setting. Lacking alternative symbols and concepts of the North on the public stage, the old stereotypes, often reflecting colonialism, still apply. This perspective has resulted in a lack of recognition by political actors of the particular characteristics of rural and northern regions and the communities that dwell within them, including the Boreal Shield ecozone; particularly a meaning of rurality that excludes “extractive” communities. Further, this lack of awareness is reinforced by the fact that the Boreal Shield and other northern ecosystems in much of the North are divided by provincial boundaries.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
a. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication, with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
b. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
c. The journal has the right to authorize third-party publishers & aggregators to include the Article in databases or other services (EBSCO, Proquest).
d. The journal has the right to share the Article on the Internet, through social media and other means.